Wikipendium

Share on Twitter Create compendium Add Language
Edit History
Tools
  • Edit
  • History
  • Share on Twitter

  • Add language

  • Create new compendium
Log in
Table of Contents
  1. Introduction and preliminaries
  2. Sequences and sequence spaces
  3. Function spaces
    1. Preliminaries
  4. Appendix
    1. Theorems
    2. Extra proofs
‹

TMA4230: Functional Analysis

Tags:
+

Introduction and preliminaries

We begin by reviewing some elementary definitions and theorems.

Definition 1. A normed space is a real or complex vector space $X$, together with a real-valued function $x \mapsto \|x\|$, defined for all $x \in X$, such that

  1. $\|x\| \geq 0$ for all $x \in X$, and $\|x\| = 0$ iff. $x = 0$.
  2. $\|\alpha x\| = \vert \alpha \vert\|x\|$, $\alpha$ scalar
  3. $\|x + y| \leq \|x\| + \|y\|$

If we wish to emphasize that we're refering to the norm of $X$, we write $\|x\|$_{X}.

Definition 2. A metric space is a set $X$ with a map $d: X \times X \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, defined for all $x, y \in X$ such that

  1. $d(x, y) \geq 0$ for all $x, y \in X$, with equality only when $x = y$.
  2. $d(x, y) = d(y, x)$ for all $x, y \in X$
  3. $d(x, z) \leq d(x, y) + d(y, z)$ for all $x,y,z \in X$

We sometimes write a metric space $X$ with map $d$ as $(X, d)$.

As might be clear, every normed space is metrizable, i.e. we can introduce a metric on the normed space, defined by

$$ d(x, y) = \|x-y\|. $$

We usually refer to $\|x-y\|$ as the displacement or distance between the elements $x$ and $y$.

Large portions of functional analysis studies the behaviour of sequences, and consequently it is handy to have a concise notation for sequences. We denote a (possibly arbitrary sequence of a set $X$ by $(x_n)_{n=1}^{\infty}$.

Definiton 3. Let $(x_n)_{n=1}^{\infty}$ be a sequence of a metric space $(X,d)$. The sequence is said to converge to a point $x$ in $X$, if for any $\epsilon > 0$, we can find an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that whenever $n \geq N$, $d(x, x_n) < \epsilon$.

Definition 4. Let $(x_n)_{n=1}^{\infty}$ be a sequence of a metric space $(X,d)$. The sequence is a cauchy sequence if for any $\epsilon > 0$, there is an $N \in \mathbb{N}$, such that whenever $n,m > N$, $d(x_n, x_m) < \epsilon$.

Note the similarity between the definitions of convergence and cauchy sequences. The inclusion only works one way though; all converging sequences are cauchy sequences. However, some cauchy sequences might converge to a point which is not part of the original metric space $X$. Take for instance the sequence of rational numbers that is the increasing decimal expansion of $\sqrt{2}: 1, 1.4, 1.41, 1.414, 1.4142, \ldots$. The sequence is obviously a cauchy sequence, but converges to $\sqrt{2}$, which is not a part of the rational numbers.

This motivates the definition of complete metric spaces.

Definition 5. A complete metric space is a metric space $(X,d)$ in which every cauchy sequence converge.

A complete metric space is a metric space that does not have "holes" in it.

Definition 6. A Banach space is a normed space $X$ which is also a complete metric space with the metric $d(x,y) = \|x-y\|$.

Of particular interest are linear maps, i.e. maps $T: X \rightarrow Y$, where $X, Y$ typically are normed (Banach) spaces. The linearity requirement says that $T(x+y) = Tx + Ty,\>T(\alpha x) = \alpha Tx$.

Definition 7. A linear map $T: X \rightarrow Y$ is said to be bounded if there exists a scalar $M \geq 0$ such that $$\|Tx\|_{Y} \leq M \|x\|_{X},$$ for all $x$. Equivalently, we can write $\|Tx\| \leq M$, whenever $\|x\| \leq 1$. The smallest such $M$, i.e. $\sup \{\|Tx\| \mid \|x\| \leq 1\}$ is denoted $\|T\|$.

Intuitively and unformally, we can read the definiton of boundedness as the requirement of not sending two points in $X$ unproportionally far away from each other in $Y$.

Proposition 8. Let $T$ be a linear map between normed spaces, $T: X \rightarrow Y$. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. $T$ is continuous
  2. $T$ is continuous at zero,
  3. $T$ is bounded

The proof is pretty straight-forward and is given in the appendix.

Definition 9. The set $\mathcal{L}(X,Y)$ is the set of all bounded linear maps from $X$ to $Y$.

This set is itself a vector space. A member of $\mathcal{L}(X,Y)$ is typically called an operator. And the value $\|T\|$ for any $T \in \mathcal{L}$ is called the operator norm on $\mathcal{L}(X,Y)$. It can be verified that the operator norm indeed is a norm under reasonable assumptions of the vector operations.

Proposition 10. If $X$ is a normed space, and $Y$ is a Banach space, then $\mathcal{L}(X,Y)$ is a Banach space.

Definition 11. If a map $T$ preserves distances for each $x$, i.e $\|Tx - Ty\| = \|x -y\|, \forall x,y \in X$, then $T$ is called an isometry. If $T$ is also linear, then $\|Tx\| = \|x\|, \forall x \in X$.

Definition 12. If a map $T$ is bijective, linear, and both it and its inverse is linear, we say that $T$ is an isomorphism. A map that satisfies both this and Definition 11 is called an isometric isomorphism.

Normed spaces $X$ and $Y$ as in the previous definitions are said to be isometric and isomorphic, respectively.

Definition 13. Two norms $\|\cdot\|_a, \|\cdot\|_b$ are equivalent if there exists constants $c$ and $d$ such that $$ c\|\cdot\|_a \leq \|\cdot\|_b \leq d\|\cdot\|_a,\quad \forall x \in X$$

Definition 14. Let $X$ be a normed space over $\mathbb{K}$ (either $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$). The dual space of $X$ is the space of all bounded linear functionals from $X$ to $\mathbb{K}$.

Example 1. Let $X$ be a metric space, and let $(x_n)_{n=1}^{\infty}$ be a convergent sequence. Show that $(x_n)_{n=1}^{\infty}$ is a cauchy sequence.

Solution. As $(x_n)_{n=1}^{\infty}$ converges, we know that for $\epsilon > 0$ there exists sufficiently large $N$ such that for any $n > N$, $d(x, x_n) < \epsilon$. Now let $M = 2N$, and let $n,m > N$. Then, $$ d(x_n, x_m) < d(x_n, x) + + d(x, x_m) < 2N = M $$

Example 2. Let X and Y be normed vector spaces and suppose $T : X \rightarrow Y$ is a linear surjection. Show that T is an isomorphism if and only if there are constants $c_1 > 0$ and $c_2 > 0$ such that:

$$ c1\|x\| \leq \|Tx\| \leq c_2\|x\| $$

Solution. We first show that an isomorhism implies the inequality. So let $T$ be an isomorphism between $X$ and $Y$. Recall from the definiton that $T$ is a continuous linear bijection with continuous inverse.

Fix an element $x$ of $X$. Because $T$ is continuous, it is also bounded. Then $\|Tx\| \leq K_1\|x\|$ for some $K_1$. Let $c_2 = K_1$. Let then $Tx$ be an element of $Y$. As $T^{-1}$ is continuous, it is also bounded. Then $T^{-1}(Tx) \leq K_2\|x\|$ for some $K_2$. As $T$ is a bijection, $T^{-1}(Tx) = x$. Let $c_1 = K_2$, and the inequality follows.

We now prove the other direction. As $T$ is a surjection, we know that the image of $X$ is $Y$. Then let $A \subset X$ be the preimage of any $y \in Y$. We will show that $A$ contains only one element $x$, proving that $T$ is a bijection. Let $x, z$ be two elements in $A$ such that $Tx = Tz = y \in Y$.

Then $$ c1\|x\| \leq \|y| \leq c_2\|x\| \\ c1\|z\| \leq \|y| \leq c_2\|z\| $$

But this means that $c1\|x\| \leq c_2\|z\|$ and $c1\|z\| \leq c_2\|x\|$. Thus $x = z$, and $T$ is a bijection. It is also continuous with a continuous inverse as it is bounded due to the inequality, by following steps similar to the first part of the solution. This concludes the proof.

Sequences and sequence spaces

A sequence is an infinite tuple of numbers, index by a $i \in \mathbb{N}$. We typically write a sequence as $(x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n,\ldots)$. Another equivalent way of defining a sequence is as a function with domain $\mathbb{N}$.

We define the following norms for sequences: $$ \begin{align} \|x\|_1 &= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} x_i \\ \|x\|_2 &= \left(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} x_i^2 \right)^{1/2} \\ \|x\|_p &= \left(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} x_i^p \right)^{1/p} \\ \|x\|_{\infty} &= sup_{i \in \mathbb{N}} \>x_i \end{align} $$

Definition 15. The set of $\ell_p$-summable sequences, $p \in [1, \infty)$, are all sequences $\xi$ for which $\|\xi\|_p$ is a finite value, i.e. less than $\infty$. Similarly defined is the set $\ell_{\infty}$, also called the set of bounded sequences.

The next lemma is important, though its proof is a bit too long to be articulated here. We refer the interested reader to this article.

Lemma 16. For $p \in (1, \infty)$, the dual space $\ell_p^*$ can be identified with $\ell_q$, where $\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1$.

Lemma 17. The space $\ell_1^*$ can be identified with $\ell_{\infty}$.

Extrapolating the two previous lemmas, one might be inclined to think that $\ell_{\infty}^*$ is $l_1$. However, this is not the case. However, we can make the following inference:

Lemma 18. Whenever $p, q \in \mathbb{N} \div \{1\}$, $\ell_p^* = \ell_q$ and $\ell_q^* = \ell_p$.

Definition 19. We say that $p$ and $q$ are conjugate exponents if they obey the equality $\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1$.

Theorem 20. The dual of the space of all convergent sequences $c = \left\{(\xi_n)_n : \lim_{n \to \infty} \xi_n exists\right\}$ can be identified with $\ell_1$.

Proof of Lemma 17 and Theorem 20 are equivalent to the proof of lemma 16.

Function spaces

Preliminaries

Unless you've had the course real analysis, some preliminary defintions are in order.

Appendix

Theorems

Extra proofs

Proof of Proposition 8. $1 \implies 2$ is obvious. Lets prove $2 \implies 3$: Let $T$ be continuous at zero. Assume $T$ is unbounded. Then for any $n \in \mathbb{N}$ there exists $\|x_n\| \leq 1$ such that $\|Tx_n\| \geq n$. We then have

$$ \|\frac{x_n}{n}\| \leq \frac{1}{n} $$

Now let $n$ go to infinity, then $\lim_{n\to\infty} \|\frac{x_n}{n}\| = 0$, and consequently $\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{x_n}{n} = 0$. By continuity at zero, we must have that

$$ \lim_{n\to\infty} \|T\frac{x_n}{n}\| = \|T(0)\| = 0 $$.

But $\|Tx_n\| \geq n \implies \|T(\frac{x_n}{n}\| \geq 1, n \in \mathbb{N}$, which is a contradiction. Therefore, $T$ must be bounded.

$3 \implies 1$: As $T$ is bounded, we have $\|T(x)\| \leq \|T\|\|x\|$. This implies that $\|T(\frac{x}{\|x\|})\| < \|T\|$, as $\|\frac{x}{\|x\|} = 1$. Using this, we can use linearity to get:

$$ \|Tx\| = \|T(\frac{x}{\|x\|})\cdot\|x\|\| \leq \|T\|\|x\|,\quad x \in X $$

Thus, substituting $x-y$ for $x$ (legal as of linearity), we get

$$ \|Tx-Ty\| \leq \|T\|\|x-y\|, $$

This proves the proposition.

In the above proof, we prove the slightly stronger statement, namely that $T$ is Lipschitz continuous. For a proof that Lipschitz continuity implies continuity, see this link.

Written by

trmd
Last updated: Thu, 19 May 2016 18:06:29 +0200 .
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • Statistics
  • Report a bug
  • Wikipendium cc-by-sa
Wikipendium is ad-free and costs nothing to use. Please help keep Wikipendium alive by donating today!