Wikipendium

Share on Twitter Create compendium
Languages
  • Norwegian
+
Edit History
Tools
  • Edit
  • History
  • Share on Twitter

  • Read in Norwegian
  • Add language

  • Create new compendium
Log in
Table of Contents
  1. General Remarks
  2. Logic
    1. Terminology and Notation
    2. Logical Connectives
      1. Precedence Rules
    3. Truth Tables
    4. The Laws of Logic
    5. Contrapositive, Converse and Inverse
    6. Logical Implication
      1. The Rules of Inference
      2. Validity of Arguments
    7. Open Statements
    8. Quantifiers
      1. Logical Equivalence and Logical Implication of Open Statements
  3. Sets
    1. Terminology and Notation
    2. Laws of Set Theory
    3. A Few Important Sets of Numbers
  4. Boolean Functions and Boolean Algebra
    1. Boolean Functions
      1. Operations on Boolean elements
      2. Terminology and Notation
      3. Laws of Boolean Functions and Boolean Variables
    2. Boolean Algebra
      1. Definition
  5. Induction and Recursion
  6. Combinatorics
  7. Relations and Functions
    1. Terminology and Notation
    2. More on Relations
    3. Hasse diagram
  8. Graphs and Trees
    1. Graphs
      1. Terminology and Notation
      2. Vertex Degree, Euler Trails, Circuits
    2. Trees
      1. Terminology and Notation
      2. Search algorithms
        1. Depth-first search algorithm
        2. Breadth-first search algorithm
  9. Languages and Finite State Machines
    1. Language
      1. Terminology and Notation
      2. Properties (Rules) of Languages
    2. Finite State Machines
      1. Major Features
      2. State Tables (Transition Tables)
      3. State Diagrams
      4. More Terminology
    3. Regular Expressions and Languages
‹

MA0301: Elementary Discrete Mathematics

Tags:
+

This study guide is primarily based on the textbook Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics: An Applied Introduction, 5th ed. by Ralph Grimaldi.

Another source of the 5th edition is here, and the third edition is available here. The instructor's manual with solutions to all the problems in the textbook can be found here. (If the links break at some point, some of the PDFs can be retrieved from the Internet Archive by pasting the links in their Wayback Machine search engine.)

Denne engelske-norske ordlisten kan være nyttig.

General Remarks

Short on time? Overwhelmed? Here are some suggestions for covering the basics which often pop up in exams:

  • Learn how to work with and simplify logical expressions, set expressions and boolean algebra expressions, using the laws listed in this guide. (When it comes to the operators, all three are pretty much the same thing, just with different symbols.)
  • Learn to write the basic structure of a proof using the principle of mathematical induction.
  • Learn the definitions of an equivalence relation and a partial ordering relation.
  • Learn the definitions of surjective, injective and bijective functions.
  • Learn the definitions of a directed graph, undirected graph and a tree.
  • Learn the difference between a permutation and combination, and how to calculate the numbers of each.
  • Learn how to draw a state diagram.

Good luck!

Logic

Sections 2.1–2.5 in Grimaldi.

Terminology and Notation

Statement (or proposition)
A declarative sentence that is either true or false, but not both. Statements are typically denoted with the lowercase letters $p$, $q$, $r$, $s$, $t$.
Primitive statement
A statement which cannot be broken down to simpler statements.
Truth value
A value which is either true or false, but not both. Denoted either in plain text as true and false, with single letters "T" and "F", or as binary integers "1" (true) and "0" (false).
Negation
A transformation of a statement to its opposite truth value. The negation of the statement $p$ is denoted $\neg p$.
Compound statement
A combination of two or more statements using logical connectives.
Tautology
A compound statement is a tautology if it is true for all truth value assignments.
Contradiction
A compound statement is a contradiction if it is false for all truth value assignments.
Argument
An argument consists of two parts: a series of statements, called premises, and a single statement, called the conclusion. An argument can be either valid or invalid, but not both.

Examples of statements: $2 + 2 = 4$ (true), $\sqrt{16}$ is an odd number (false), $\frac{100}{5} > 10$ (true). The following are not statements: $x + 2 > 3$ (this is an open statement), "Does 3 divide 54?" (this is a question).

Logical Connectives

Conjunction
The conjunction of the statements $p$, $q$ is denoted by $p \land q$, which is read "$p$ and $q$". The conjunction of two statements is true only when both statements are true, and false otherwise.
Disjunction
The disjunction of the statements $p$, $q$ is denoted by $p \lor q$, which is read "$p$ or $q$". The disjunction of two statements is true if one or both statements are true, and false otherwise.
Exclusive "or"
The exclusive "or" is denoted by $p \veebar q$ or $p \oplus q$. The compound statement $p \veebar q$ is true if either $p$ or $q$ is true, but is false if both are true.
Implication
The implication of $q$ by $p$ is written $p \rightarrow q$, and we say that "$p$ implies $q$". In the compound statement $p \rightarrow q$, $p$ is called the hypothesis of the implication and $q$ is called the conclusion. Note: An implication does not signify any causal relationship between the statements. "$p$ implies $q$" is true when both $p$ and $q$ are true, is false when $p$ is true and $q$ is false, and is true when $p$ is false, regardless of the truth value of $q$ ("with a false hypothesis, anything can be proved to be true"). See table 1 for clarification.
Biconditional
The biconditional of two statements $p$, $q$ is denoted by $p \leftrightarrow q$, which is read "$p$ if and only if $q$" (often abbreviated "$p$ iff $q$"), or "$p$ is necessary and sufficient for $q$". The compound statement $p \leftrightarrow q$ is true if $p$ and $q$ have equal truth values.
Dual of a statement
If a statement $s$ contains no logical connectives other than $\land$ and $\lor$ (i.e. no implication, biconditional, exclusive "or"), then the dual of $s$, denoted $s^d$, is the statement obtained from $s$ by replacing each occurrence of $\land$ by $\lor$ and vice versa, and replacing each occurence of $T_0$ by $F_0$ and vice versa. Note that since $\neg$ is not a logical connective, $\neg p \equiv (\neg p)^d$.
Principle of duality
Let $s$ and $t$ be statements that contain no logical connectives other than $\land$ and $\lor$. If $s \equiv t$, then $s^d \equiv t^d$. In other words, if two statements are equivalent, then their duals are also equivalent.

Other ways to express "$p$ implies $q$" are:

  • "If $p$, then $q$"
  • "$p$ is sufficient for $q$"
  • "$q$ is necessary for $p$"
  • "$p$ only if $q$"

Precedence Rules

Just as in regular arithmetic, where the operator for multiplication (and division) has a higher order of precendence than the operator for addition (and subtraction), the logical operators have the following order of precendence:

  1. $\neg$
  2. $\land$
  3. $\lor$
  4. $\rightarrow$
  5. $\leftrightarrow$

Thus, the expression $p \lor q \land \neg r \rightarrow s$ is a shorter way of writing $(p \lor (q \land (\neg r))) \rightarrow s$. Note that all in the above list are called logical operators, but that $\neg$ is not a logical connective, while the rest are.

Truth Tables

The truth value of a compound statement depends only on the truth values of its components. The above definitions can be summarized by the following truth table (table 1). Note how $\neg p \lor q$ has the same truth values as $p \rightarrow q$, which means they are equivalent statements. Here we write "1" for true and "0" for false, but "T" and "F" may also be used in a truth table.

Table 1.
$p$ $\neg p$ $q$ $p \land q$ $p \lor q$ $p \veebar q$ $p \rightarrow q$ $p \leftrightarrow q$ $\neg p \lor q$
1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1

Using truth tables you can prove theese two theorems: Image of truth table Theorem Truth table proof

The Laws of Logic

Two statements $s_1$ and $s_2$ are said to be logically equivalent, and we write $s_1 \equiv s_2$ (or $s_1 \Leftrightarrow s_2$), when the statement $s_1$ is true (respectively, false) if and only if the statement $s_2$ is true (respectively, false). This is the same as saying that $s_1$ and $s_2$ provide the same truth tables.

The following table lists the laws for the algebra of propositions, or "The Laws of Logic", for any primitive statements $p$, $q$, $r$, any tautology $T_0$ and any contradiction $F_0$:

Table 2.
Law Symbolic Form
Law of Double Negation $\neg\neg p \equiv p$
DeMorgan's Laws $\begin{split} & \neg(p \lor q) \equiv \neg p \land \neg q \\ & \neg(p \land q) \equiv \neg p \lor \neg q \end{split}$
Commutative Laws $\begin{split} & p \lor q \equiv q \lor p \\ & p \land q \equiv q \land p \end{split}$
Associative Laws $\begin{split} & p \lor (q \lor r) \equiv (p \lor q) \lor r \\ & (p \land q) \land r \equiv p \land (q \land r) \end{split}$
Distributive Laws $\begin{split} & p \lor (q \land r) \equiv (p \lor q) \land (p \lor r) \\ & p \land (q \lor r) \equiv (p \land q) \lor (p \land r) \end{split}$
Idempotent Laws $\begin{split} & p \lor p \equiv p \\ & p \land p \equiv p \end{split}$
Identity Laws $\begin{split} & p \lor F_0 \equiv p \\ & p \land T_0 \equiv p \end{split}$
Inverse Laws $\begin{split} & p \lor \neg p \equiv T_0 \\ & p \land \neg p \equiv F_0 \end{split}$
Domination Laws $\begin{split} & p \lor T_0 \equiv T_0 \\ & p \land F_0 \equiv F_0 \end{split}$
Absorption Laws $\begin{split} & p \lor (p \land q) \equiv p \\ & p \land (p \lor q) \equiv p \end{split}$

Contrapositive, Converse and Inverse

The implication $p \rightarrow q$ has three special related statements:

Contrapositive
$\neg q \rightarrow \neg p$ is the contrapositive of $p \rightarrow q$. The contrapositive of an implication is generated by negating both sides and having the hypothesis and the conclusion change places.
Converse
$q \rightarrow p$ is the converse of $p \rightarrow q$. The converse of an implication is generated by having the hypothesis and conclusion change places. (Think "converse = reverse", as in reversing the direction of the arrow.)
Inverse
$\neg p \rightarrow \neg q$ is the inverse of $p \rightarrow q$. The inverse of an implication is generated by negating both the hypothesis and conclusion, but they do not change places.

Note: It is only the contrapositive which is equivalent to the original implication. That is, $$p \rightarrow q \equiv \neg q \rightarrow \neg p,$$ but $$p \rightarrow q \not\equiv q \rightarrow p \,\, \mathrm{and} \,\, p \rightarrow q \not\equiv \neg p \rightarrow \neg q.$$

This can be observed in the following truth table.

Table 3.
Contrapositive Converse Inverse
$p$ $q$ $p \rightarrow q$ $\neg q \rightarrow \neg p$ $q \rightarrow p$ $\neg p \rightarrow \neg q$
1 0 0 0 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 1 0 0
0 0 1 1 1 1

Logical Implication

If $p \rightarrow q$ is a tautology (always true), then we say that "p logically implies q" and we write $p \Rightarrow q$. The notation $p \not\Rightarrow q$ is used to indicate that $p \rightarrow q$ is not a tautology, and so it is not a logical implication.

The Rules of Inference

The three dots $\therefore$ stand for the word "therefore", indication a conclusion of a series of premises.

Table 4.
Name of Rule Rule of Inference Related Logical Implication
Rule of Detachment $\begin{equation} \;\;\; p \\ \underline{\;\;\; p \rightarrow q} \\ \therefore q \end{equation}$ $\big( p \land (p \rightarrow q) \big) \rightarrow q$
Law of the Syllogism $\begin{equation} \;\;\; p \rightarrow q \\ \underline{\;\;\; q \rightarrow r} \\ \therefore p \rightarrow r \end{equation}$ $\big( (p \rightarrow q) \land (q \rightarrow r) \big) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow r)$
Modus Tollens $\begin{equation} \;\;\; p \rightarrow q \\ \underline{\;\;\; \neg q \;\;\;\;\;} \\ \therefore \neg p \end{equation}$ $\big( (p \rightarrow q) \land \neg q \big) \rightarrow \neg p$
Rule of Conjunction $\begin{equation} \;\;\; p \\ \underline{\;\;\; q \;\;\;\;\;\;} \\ \therefore p \land q \end{equation}$
Rule of Disjunctive Syllogism $\begin{equation} \;\;\; p \lor q \\ \underline{\;\;\; \neg p \;\;\;\;} \\ \therefore q \end{equation}$ $\big( (p \lor q) \land \neg p \big) \rightarrow q$
Rule of Contradiction $\begin{equation} \underline{\;\;\; \neg p \rightarrow F_0 } \\ \therefore p \end{equation}$ $(\neg p \rightarrow F_0) \rightarrow p$
Rule of Conjunctive Simplification $\begin{equation} \underline{\;\;\; p \land q } \\ \therefore p \end{equation}$ $(p \land q) \rightarrow p$
Rule of Disjunctive Amplification $\begin{equation} \underline{\;\;\; p \;\;\;\;\;\;} \\ \therefore p \lor q \end{equation}$ $p \rightarrow p \lor q$
Rule of Conditional Proof $\begin{equation} \;\;\; p \land q \\ \underline{\;\;\; p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r) } \\ \therefore r \end{equation}$ $\Big( (p \land q) \land \big( p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r) \big) \Big) \rightarrow r$
Rule for Proof by Cases $\begin{equation} \;\;\; p \rightarrow r \\ \underline{\;\;\; q \rightarrow r \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;} \\ \therefore (p \lor q) \rightarrow r \end{equation}$ $\big( (p \rightarrow q) \land (q \rightarrow r) \big) \rightarrow \big( (p \lor r) \rightarrow r \big)$
Rule of the Constructive Dilemma $\begin{equation} \;\;\; p \rightarrow q \\ \;\;\; r \rightarrow s \\ \underline{\; \; \; p \lor r \;} \\ \therefore q \lor s \end{equation}$ $\big( (p \rightarrow q) \land (r \rightarrow s) \land (p \lor r) \big) \rightarrow (q \lor s)$
Rule of the Destructive Dilemma $\begin{equation} \; \; \; p \rightarrow q \\ \; \; \; r \rightarrow s \\ \underline{\; \; \; \neg q \lor \neg s } \\ \therefore \neg p \lor \neg r \end{equation}$ $\big( (p \rightarrow q) \land (r \rightarrow s) \land (\neg q \lor \neg s) \big) \rightarrow (\neg p \lor \neg r)$
Resolution $\begin{equation} \; \; \; p \lor q \\ \underline{\; \; \; \neg p \lor r} \\ \therefore q \lor r \end{equation}$ $\big( (p \lor q) \land (\neg p \lor r) \big) \rightarrow (q \lor r)$

Validity of Arguments

An argument, i.e. a series of one or more premises followed by a conclusion, can be valid or invalid. The truth values of the primitive statements the premises and the conclusion are comprised of determine the argument's validity.

To show that an argument is invalid, we only need one assignment of truth values for each of the statements in the argument such that the conclusion is false, while the premises are all true. Thus, only one case is needed to disprove an argument's validity.

To prove that an implication of the form $$(p_1 \land p_2 \land p_3 \land \dots \land p_n) \rightarrow q$$ presents a valid argument, we need to examine all cases where the premises $p_1$, $p_2$, $p_3$, ..., $p_n$ are true. As each premise might be a compound statement composed of multiple primitive statements, each case is a unique combination of assigned truth values for the primitive statements. Correct use of the rules of inference together with the laws of logic and other logical equivalences is a compact way of proving the validity of an argument, instead of writing out a truth table.

Open Statements

A declarative sentence is a open statement if

  1. it contains one or more variables (e.g. $x$), and
  2. it is not a statement, but
  3. it becomes a statement when the variables in it are replaced by certain allowable choices.

These allowable choices constitute what is called the universe or universe of discourse for the open statement. The universe comprises the choices we wish to consider or allow for the variable(s) in the open statement.

An example of an open statement with a single variable: $$p(x)\!: \; \text{ The number } x + 2 \text{ is an even integer.}$$

An example of an open statement with two variables: $$q(x, y)\!: \; \text{ The numbers } y + 2, x - y \text{ and } x + 2y \text{ are even integers.}$$

Given a universe of integers, we can make the following true statements:

  1. For some $x$, $p(x)$
  2. For some $x$, $y$, $q(x, y)$

The phrases "For some x" are said to quantify the open statements $p(x)$ and $q(x, y)$, respectively. There are two kinds of quantifiers; the existential and the universal quantifiers.

Quantifiers

The existential quantifier
The existential quantifier is denoted by $\exists x$ and can be expressed as "For some $x$", "For at least one $x$", "There exists and $x$ such that". Thus, "For some $x$, $p(x)$" is written $\exists x \; p(x)$ in symbolic form. "For some $x$, $y$, $q(x, y)$" is written $\exists x \, \exists y \; q(x, y)$ in symbolic form, which can be abbreviated to $\exists x,y \; q(x, y)$.
The universal quantifier
The universal quanitifier is denoted by $\forall x$ and can be expressed as "For all $x$", "For any $x$", "For each $x$" or "For every $x$". Same as with the existential quantifier, "For all $x$, $p(x)$" is written $\forall x \; p(x)$ in symbolic form, and "For all $x$ and $y$" is written $\forall x \, \forall y$, abbreviated to $\forall x, y$.

Note: The statements $\forall{x} \; \exists{y} \; p(x, y)$ and $\exists{y} \; \forall{x} \; p(x, y)$ are generally not logically equivalent.

The truth values of quantified open statements are summarized in table 5.

Table 5.
Statement When Is It True? When Is It False?
$\exists x \; p(x)$ For some (at least one) $a$ in the universe, $p(a)$ is true. For every $a$ in the universe, $p(a)$ is false.
$\forall x \; p(x)$ For every replacement $a$ from the universe, $p(a)$ is true. There is at least one replacement $a$ fromt he universe for which $p(a)$ is false.
$\exists x \; \neg p(x)$ For at least one choice $a$ in the universe, $p(a)$ is false, so its negation $\neg p(a)$ is true. For every replacement $a$ in the universe, $p(a)$ is true.
$\forall x \; \neg p(x)$ For every replacement $a$ from the universe, $p(a)$ is false and its negation $\neg p(a)$ is true. There is at least one replacement $a$ from the universe for which $\neg p(a)$ is false and $p(a)$ is true.

Logical Equivalence and Logical Implication of Open Statements

Let $p(x)$, $q(x)$ be open statements defined for a given universe. The open statements $p(x)$ and $q(x)$ are logically equivalent, written $\forall x \; \big( p(x) \equiv q(x) \big)$, when $p(a) \equiv q(a)$ for each replacement $a$ from the universe.

Similarly, if $p(a) \Rightarrow q(a)$ is true for each $a$ in the universe, then we write $\forall x \; \big( p(x) \Rightarrow q(x) \big)$.

For a prescribed universe and any open statements $p(x)$, $q(x)$ in the variable $x$: $$ \exists{x} \; \big( p(x) \land q(x) \big) \Rightarrow \big( \exists{x} \; p(x) \land \exists{x} \; q(x) \big) \\ \exists{x} \; \big( p(x) \lor q(x) \big) \equiv \big( \exists{x} \; p(x) \lor \exists{x} \; q(x) \big) \\ \forall{x} \; \big( p(x) \land q(x) \big) \equiv \big( \forall{x} \; p(x) \land \forall{x} \; q(x) \big) \\ \big( \forall{x} \; p(x) \lor \forall{x} \; q(x) \big) \Rightarrow \big( \forall{x} \; p(x) \land \forall{x} \; q(x) \big) $$

Rules for negating statements with one quantifier:

$$ \neg \big( \forall{x} \; p(x) \big) \equiv \exists{x} \; \neg p(x) \\ \neg \big( \exists{x} \; p(x) \big) \equiv \forall{x} \; \neg p(x) \\ \neg \big( \forall{x} \; \neg p(x) \big) \equiv \exists{x} \; \neg \neg p(x) \equiv \exists{x} \; p(x) \\ \neg \big( \exists{x} \; \neg p(x) \big) \equiv \forall{x} \; \neg \neg p(x) \equiv \forall{x} \; p(x) $$

Rule of Universal Specification
If an open statement becomes true for all replacements by the members in a given universe, then that open statement is true for each specific individual member in a given universe. In semi-symbolic form: If $p(x)$ is an open statement for a given universe, and if $\forall{x} \; p(x)$ is true, then $p(a)$ is true for each $a$ in the universe.
Rule of Universal Generalization
If an open statement $p(x)$ is proven to be true when $x$ is replaced by any arbitrarily chosen element $c$ from our universe, then the universally quantified statement $\forall{x} \; p(x)$ is true. Furthermore, the rule extends beyond a single variable. So if, for example, we have an open statment $q(x, y)$ that is proved to be true when $x$ and $y$ are replaced by arbitrarily chosen elements from the same universe, or their own respective universes, then the universally quantified statement $\forall{x} \; \forall{y} \; q(x, y)$ is true. Similar results holdfor the cases of three or more variables.

See also the rules of existential specification and existential generalization in exercise 10, section 2.5 in Grimaldi.

Sets

Sections 3.1 and 3.2 in Grimaldi.

Terminology and Notation

Set
A well-defined collection of objects. Sets are typically denoted with uppercase letters, such as $A$, $B$, $C$, etc. The specification of a set is done with set braces. Example: $A = \{1, 2, 3\} = \{x|x \in \mathbb{Z} \text{ and } 1 \leq x \leq 3 \}$.
Element
A member of a set. Members of sets are typically denoted with lowercase letters. If $x$ is an element of $A$, we write $x \in A$, and if $y$ is not an element of A, we write $y \not\in A$.
Universe (of discourse)
Specifies what "bag" of elements we are choosing from when forming a set. The set $\{x|1 \leq x \leq 3\}$ with $x$ from the universe of all integers is not the same set as $\{x|1 \leq x \leq 3\}$ with $x$ from the universe of all real numbers. We will use the notation $\mathcal{U}$ for the universe here.
Cardinality
The number of elements in a set. The cardinality of a set $A$ is denoted by $|A|$.
Finite set
A set which has a finite number of elements. Think of it as a set you can count and finish counting at some point. Formally, it is a set whose cardinality is less than the cardinality of the natural numbers.
Infinite set
Simply put, a set that is not a finite set. Infinite sets are either countable or uncountable, but that is not important for this course.
Subset
If every element in set $A$ is also an element of set $B$, we say that $A$ is a subset of $B$ and write $A \subseteq B$ (also,$B \supseteq A$). If $A$ i not a subset of $B$ we write $A \not\subseteq B$.
Proper subset
If every element in set $A$ is also an element of set $B$ and $B$ contains an element (or more) which is not in $A$, $A$ is a proper subset of $B$, and we write $A \subset B$ (also $B \supset A$). If $A$ is not a proper subset of $B$ we write $A \not\subset B$.
Equality of sets
If $A$ is a subset of $B$ and $B$ is a subset of $A$, they are equal and we write $A = B$. This is the same as saying that $A$ and $B$ contain exactly the same elements. Note that the order in which the elements appear in a set does not matter.
Null set or empty set
The set containing no elements. It is denoted by $\emptyset$ or { }. Its cardinality is 0. If $A$ is a set, then the empty set is always a subset of $A$ ($\emptyset \subseteq A$), and if $A$ is not empty ($A \neq \emptyset$), then the empty set is a proper subset of $A$ ($\emptyset \subset A$).
Power set
The collection of all subsets of a given set $A$. It is denoted by $\mathcal{P}(A)$. The total number of subsets of a set $A$ where $|A| = n$ is $2^n$. Stated differently, $|\mathcal{P}(A)| = 2^{|A|}$.
Union
The union of two sets $A$ and $B$ is written $A \cup B$. If an element is either in $A$ or $B$ (or both), it is in the set $A \cup B$. In symbolic form their union is given by $A \cup B = \{x|x \in A \lor x \in B \}$. Note that in the same way that $1 +2 +3 + \dots + n = \Sigma^n_{i=1}i$, we can write the union of multiple sets with the big union notation, for example: $S_1 \cup S_2 \cup S_3 \cup \dots \cup S_n = \bigcup^n_{i=1}S_i$.
Intersection
The intersection of two sets $A$ and $B$ is written $A \cap B$. If an element is in $A$ and also in $B$, it is in the set $A \cap B$. In symbolic form their intersection is given by $A \cap B = \{x|x \in A \land x \in B \}$. As above with unions, the intersection of multiple sets can be written with the big intersection notation, for example: $S_1 \cap S_2 \cap S_3 \cap \dots \cap S_n = \bigcap^n_{i=1}S_i$.
Symmetric difference
The symmetric difference of two sets $A$ and $B$ is written $A \vartriangle B$. If an element is in either $A$ or $B$ but not in both, it is in the set $A \vartriangle B$. In symbolic form the symmetric difference is given by $A \vartriangle B = \{x|x \in A \cup B \land x \not\in A \cap B\}$.
Disjoint
Two sets in the same universe are called disjoint or mutually disjoint when they do not share any elements. For the sets $S, T \subseteq \mathcal{U}$, we write this as $S \cap T = \emptyset$.
Complement
The complement of a set $A \subseteq \mathcal{U}$ consists of all the elements in the universe except the elements in $A$. It is denoted $\overline{A}$ (sometimes $\mathcal{U} - A$). In symbolic form the complement is given by $\overline{A} = \{x|x \in \mathcal{U} \land x \not\in A\}$.
Relative complement
The (relative) complement of $A$ in $B$, denoted $B - A$, consists of all the elements of $B$ except the elements which are in $A$. In symbolic form the relative complement of $A$ in $B$ is given by $B - A = \{x|x \in B \land x \not\in A\}$.
Duality of set expressions
The dual of a set expression is obtained by replacing all "$\emptyset$" with "$\mathcal{U}$" and vice versa, and replacing all "$\cap$" with "$\cup$" and vice versa.
Principle of Duality
Simply put, if two set expressions are equal, then their duals are also equal.

Laws of Set Theory

Law of Double Complement
$\begin{equation} \overline{\overline{A}} = A \end{equation}$
DeMorgan's Laws
$\begin{equation} \overline{A \cup B} = \overline{A} \cap \overline{B} \\ \overline{A \cap B} = \overline{A} \cup \overline{B} \end{equation}$
Generalized DeMorgan's Laws
$\begin{equation} \text{Let } I \text{ be an index set,} \\ \overline{\bigcup_{i \in I}A_i} = \bigcap_{i \in I} \overline{A_i} \\ \overline{\bigcap_{i \in I}A_i} = \bigcup_{i \in I} \overline{A_i} \end{equation}$
Commutative Laws
$\begin{equation} A \cup B = B \cup A \\ A \cap B = B \cap A \end{equation}$
Associative Laws
$\begin{equation} A \cup (B \cup C) = (A \cup B) \cup C \\ A \cap (B \cap C) = (A \cap B) \cap C \end{equation}$
Distributive Laws
$\begin{equation} A \cup (B \cap C) = (A \cup B) \cap (A \cup C) \\ A \cap (B \cup C) = (A \cap B) \cup (A \cap C) \end{equation}$
Idempotent Laws
$\begin{equation} A \cup A = A \\ A \cap A = A \end{equation}$
Identity Laws
$\begin{equation} A \cup \emptyset = A \\ A \cap \mathcal{U} = A \end{equation}$
Inverse Laws
$\begin{equation} A \cup \overline{A} = \mathcal{U} \\ A \cap \overline{A} = \emptyset \end{equation}$
Domination laws
$\begin{equation} A \cup \mathcal{U} = \mathcal{U} \\ A \cap \emptyset = \emptyset \end{equation}$
Absorption Laws
$\begin{equation} A \cup (A \cap B) = A \\ A \cap (A \cup B) = A \end{equation}$

A Few Important Sets of Numbers

$\mathbb{N}$ the set of natural numbers $\{0, 1, 2, 3, \dots \}$
$\mathbb{Z}$ the set of integers $\{\dots, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, \dots \}$
$\mathbb{Q}$ the set of rational numbers $\{\frac{a}{b}|a, b \in \mathbb{Z}, b\neq 0\}$
$\mathbb{R}$ the set of real numbers i.e. all numbers along the number line

Note! We have defined the set of natural numbers to include 0. This is a convention in discrete mathematics/number theory (c.f. Grimaldi, Rosen), but it is not the most common practice in mathematics as a whole (where the natural numbers usually start at 1). An unambiguous notation for the set of non-negative integers is $\mathbb{N^0}$ or $\mathbb{N_0}$, and either $\mathbb{N^+}$ or $\mathbb{Z^+}$ for the set of positive integers. But if you want to read about how including or not including 0 are just two sides of the same coin, check this out.

Boolean Functions and Boolean Algebra

Sections 15.1 and 15.4 in Grimaldi.

Boolean Functions

Operations on Boolean elements

Let $B$ be a Boolean domain {0, 1}, i.e. a set consisting of exactly two values which represent false and true.

A variable $x$ is called a Boolean variable if it only takes on values in $B$, i.e. $x$ can only be equal to 0 or 1.

Table ? gives an overview of the definitions of addition, multiplication and complement on the elements in $B$, and some consequences of these definitions on the arithmetic of Boolean variables.

Table ?.
Elements in $B$ Boolean variables
Addition $\begin{equation}0 + 0 = 0 \\ 1 + 1 = 1 + 0 = 0 + 1 = 1 \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation}x + x = x \\ x + y = 0 \leftrightarrow x = y = 0 \end{equation}$
Multiplication $\begin{equation}1 \cdot 1 = 1 \\ 0 \cdot 0 = 0 \cdot 1 = 1 \cdot 0 = 0 \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation}x^2 = x \cdot x = xx = x \\ xy = 1 \leftrightarrow x = y = 1 \end{equation}$
Complement $\begin{equation} \overline{0} = 1 \\ \overline{1} = 0 \end{equation}$

Terminology and Notation

The conjunctive normal form, sum of minterms, disjunctive normal form and product of maxterms may require looking at more examples than are provided here in order to grasp the concepts.

Boolean variable
A variable which only takes the values 0 or 1, and is operated on using the Boolean arithmetic described in table ?.
Switching function or Boolean function
A function which takes in $n$ Boolean variables and outputs a single Boolean value; 0 or 1 depending on the input to the function. We write this as $f \! : B^n \rightarrow B$. Example of a Boolean function: $g \! : B^3 \rightarrow B$, where $g(x, y, z) = xy + z$.
Dual of a Boolean function
The dual of a Boolean function is obtained by replacing all occurences of + by $\cdot$ and vice versa, and all occurences of 0 by 1 and vice versa.
Principle of Duality
Simply put, if two Boolean functions or expressions of Boolean variables are equal, then their duals are also equal.
Literal
Each term $x_i$ of a Boolean function $f(x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n)$ or its complement. The literals of $f(x, y, z)$ are "$x$ or $\overline{x}$", "$y$ or $\overline{y}$" and "$z$ or $\overline{z}$".
Fundamental conjunction
A single term in which all literals of a Boolean function are multiplied, for example $\overline{x}y\overline{z}$ or $xy\overline{z}$ for $f(x, y, z)$.
Disjunctive normal form (d.n.f.)
A representation of a Boolean function as a sum of fundamental conjunctions. For example, the d.n.f. for $f: B^3 \rightarrow B$, where $f(x, y, z) = xy + \overline{x}z$ is $f(x, y, z) = \overline{x}\overline{y}z + \overline{x}yz + xy\overline{z} + xyz$.
Minterm
A way of representing a fundamental conjunction. A minterm is an encoding of a fundamental conjunction as a binary label, which is converted to a number. We write the minterms of the function $f$ defined above as $m(1, 3, 6, 7)$. See table ? for how the encoding is done.
Sum of minterms
The disjunctive normal form (d.n.f.) of a function can be expressed as a sum of minterms, since the minterms are just a way to represent the fundamental conjunctions of the d.n.f. For the function $f$ defined above, we write this as $f = \sum m(1, 3, 6, 7)$. This is simply a more concise way of expressing the d.n.f.
Fundamental disjunction
A single term in which all literals of a Boolean function are added together, for example $x + \overline{y} + z$ for the function $f(x, y, z)$.
Conjunctive normal form (c.n.f.)
A representation of a Boolean function as a product of fundamental disjunctions.
Maxterm
A way of representing a fundamental disjunction. A maxterm is an encoding of a fundamental disjunction as a binary label, which is converted to a number. A capital M is used for maxterms (as opposed to lowercase m for minterms): $M(0, 2, 6)$. See table ? for how the encoding is done.
Product of maxterms
The conjunctive normal form (c.n.f.) of a function can be expressed as a product of maxterms. For a function $f$ with the maxterms $M(0, 2, 6)$ we write $f = \prod M(0, 2, 6)$.
Table ?.

For a function with three variables $x, y, z$, the minterm/maxterm numbers are determined by the binary label resulting from the following table. In the table, 0 means a variable's complement (like $\overline{x}$) and 1 means a variable as it is (like $x$).

$x$ $y$ $z$ Binary label Minterm/maxterm number
0 0 0 000 0
0 0 1 001 1
0 1 0 010 2
0 1 1 011 3
1 0 0 100 4
1 0 1 101 5
1 1 0 110 6
1 1 1 111 7

Laws of Boolean Functions and Boolean Variables

Notice how the laws of Boolean algebra are just a restatement of the laws of logic and the laws of set theory, using "+" for "$\lor$" / "$\cup$" and "$\cdot$" (multiplication) for "$\land$" / "$\cap$".

Law Boolean Functions Boolean Variables
Law of the Double Complement $\overline{\overline{f}} = f$ $\overline{\overline{x}} = x$
DeMorgan's Laws $\begin{equation} \overline{f + g} = \overline{f} \overline{g} \\ \overline{fg} = \overline{f} + \overline{g} \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation} \overline{x + y} = \overline{x} \overline{y} \\ \overline{xy} = \overline{x} + \overline{y} \end{equation}$
Commutative Laws $\begin{equation} f + g = g + f \\ fg = gf \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation} x + y = y + x \\ xy = yx \end{equation}$
Associative Laws $\begin{equation} f + (g + h) = (f + g) + h \\ f(gh) = (fg)h \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation} x + (y + z) = (x + y) + z \\ x(yz) = (xy)z \end{equation}$
Distributive Laws $\begin{equation} f + gh = (f + g)(f + h)\\ f(g + h) = fg + fh \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation} x + yz = (x + y)(x + z) \\ x(y + z) = xy + xz \end{equation}$
Idempotent Laws $\begin{equation} f + f = f \\ ff = f \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation} x + x = x \\ xx = x \end{equation}$
Identity Laws $\begin{equation} f + 0 = f \\ f \cdot 1 = f \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation} x + 0 = x \\ x \cdot 1 = x \end{equation}$
Inverse Laws $\begin{equation} f + \overline{f} = 1 \\ f\overline{f} = 0 \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation} x + \overline{x} = 1 \\ x\overline{x} = 0 \end{equation}$
Dominance Laws $\begin{equation} f + 1 = 1 \\ f \cdot 0 = 0 \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation} x + 1 = 1 \\ x \cdot 0 = 0 \end{equation}$
Absorption Laws $\begin{equation} f + fg = f \\ f(f + g) = f \end{equation}$ $\begin{equation} x + xy = x \\ x(x + y) = x \end{equation}$

Boolean Algebra

Definition

Let $\mathcal{B}$ be a nonempty set that contains two special elements: the zero element (0) and the one element (1), and on which we define closed binary operations +, $\cdot$ and a unary operation $^\overline{\;}$. Then $(\mathcal{B}, +, \cdot, ^\overline{\;}, 0, 1)$ is called a Boolean algebra if for all variables $x, y, z \in \mathcal{B}$, the following conditions are satisfied:

Commutative Laws
$\begin{equation}x + y = y + x \\ xy = yx \end{equation}$
Distributive Laws
$\begin{equation}x(y + z) = xy + xz\\ x + yz = (x + y)(x + z) \end{equation}$
Identity Laws
$\begin{equation}x + 0 = x \\ x \cdot 1 = x \end{equation}$
Inverse Laws
$\begin{equation} x + \overline{x} = 1 \\ x \cdot \overline{x} = 0 \end{equation}$
Inequality of the Special Elements
$0 \neq 1$

When the operations and identity elements are known, we simply write $\mathcal{B}$ instead of $(\mathcal{B}, +, \cdot, ^\overline{\;}, 0, 1)$.

Currently missing from this section: More Laws for a Boolean Algebra (derived from the definition of a BA), Hasse diagrams, partial ordering of any finite Boolean algebra, atoms of a Boolean algebra, isomorphism of Boolean algebras, some examples of Boolean algebras other than the two-element Boolean algebra.

Induction and Recursion

Sections 4.1 and 4.2 in Grimaldi.

To get a good grasp of mathematical induction, you need to practice writing detailed, correct proofs.

The Well-Ordering Principle
Every nonempty subset of $\mathbb{Z^+}$ contains a smallest element. (This is important as a basis for mathematical induction. Consider also the fact that neither $\mathbb{Q^+}$ nor $\mathbb{R^+}$ have a smallest element, i.e. they are not well ordered like $\mathbb{Z^+}$).
The Principle of Mathematical Induction
Let $n$ represent a positive integer and let $S(n)$ be a mathematical statement involving $n$. If $S(1)$ is true and if $S(k+1)$ is true whenever $S(k)$ is true for an arbitrarily chosen positive integer $k$, then $S(n)$ is true for all positive integers. For the geeks out there: $\Big(S(n_0) \land \big( \forall \; k \geq n_0 \; (S(k) \Rightarrow S(k+1)) \big)\Big) \Rightarrow \forall \; n \geq n_0 \; S(n).$
Basis step
The first step in mathematical induction: Proving that the statement is true for a smallest integer of choice, typically 0 or 1. The rest of the induction rests upon this step.
Inductive step
The second step in mathematical induction: Proving that whenever the statement is true for any arbitrary integer $k$ greater than or equal to the integer in the basis step, the statement is also true for $k + 1$. So if $S(1)$ is true, and we succeed in the inductive step, then $S(2), S(3), S(4), \dots$ will also be true. To inifinity and beyond!
Recursion
A recursive definition has two parts: 1) A base case (or cases) which do not use recursion for their values, and 2) a set of rules that reduce all other cases toward the base case. See the below entries for examples.
Fibonacci numbers
Base case: $F_0 = 0, F_1 = 1$. Recursive rule: $F_n = F_{n-1} + F_{n-2}$, for $n \in \mathbb{Z^+}$ with $n \geq 2$. The first eight Fibonacci numbers are 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21.
Harmonic numbers
Base case: $H_1 = 1$. Recursive rule: $H_{n+1} = H_n + (\frac{1}{n+1})$, for $n \in \mathbb{Z^+}$ with $n \geq 1$. The $n$th harmonic number $H_n$ is $1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \cdots + \frac{1}{n}$.
Lucas numbers
Base case: $L_0 = 2, L_1 = 1$. Recursive rule: $L_n = L_{n-1} + L_{n-2}$, for $n \in \mathbb{Z^+}$ with $n \geq 2$. The first eight Lucas numbers are 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29.

Combinatorics

Sections 1.1–1.5 and 8.1 in Grimaldi.

When learning the formulas for the combinatorial principles, permutations, combinations etc., make sure you also know what practical problems the formulas are used to solve (and practice solving them).

This section on combinatorics could be improved by adding a subsection with a handful examples of common practical problems (string permutations, team selections, stars and bars problems, etc.).

Rule of sum (addition principle)
Simply put, if we have $m$ ways of doing something and $n$ ways of doing another thing and we can not do both at the same time, then there are $m + n$ ways to choose one of the actions.
Rule of product (multiplication principle)
Simply put, if we have $m$ ways of doing something and $n$ ways of doing another thing, then there are $m \cdot n$ ways to do both actions.
Factorial
For an integer $n \geq 0$, "$n$ factorial" is denoted by $n!$ and is defined by $0! = 1$, $n! = (n)(n-1)(n-2)\cdots(3)(2)(1)$, for $n \geq 1$. For example, $4! = 4\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1 = 24$. Also, knowing that $(n+1)! = (n+1)(n!)$ is often useful.
Permutation (ordered arrangement)
A linear arrangement of a collection of distinct objects where the order of the objects in the arrangement is important, and repetition of objects is not permitted. The number of permutations of size $r$ (where $0 \leq r \leq n$) from a collection of $n$ objects is $P(n, r) = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!}$.
Linear arrangements with repetition
The number of linear arrangements of size $r$ from a collection of size $n$ when objects can be repeated, is $n^r$, with $r \geq 0$.
Linear arrangements with identical objects
If there are $n$ objects with $n_1$ identical objects of a first kind, $n_2$ identical objects of a second kind, …, and $n_r$ identical objects of an $r$th kind, where $n_1 + n_2 + \cdots + n_r = n$, then there are $\begin{equation} \frac{n!}{n_1!n_2!\cdots n_r!}\end{equation}$ linear arrangements of the given $n$ objects.
Circular arrangement
For a collection of $n$ objects, each circular arrangement corresponds to $n$ linear arrangements, so that there are in total $\frac{n!}{n}$ circular arrangements.
Binomial coefficient
The notation $\binom{n}{r}$ is called the binomial coefficient and is equal to $\frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}$ (see "Combination" below).
Combination (unordered selection)
A selection from a collection of distinct objects where the order of the objects is not important, and repetition is not allowed. The number of combinations of size $r$ (where $0 \leq r \leq n$) from a collection of $n$ objects is $C(n, r) = \binom{n}{r} = \binom{n}{n - r} = \frac{P(n, r)}{r!} = \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}$.
Combination with repetition
The number of combinations of $n$ objects of size $r$ with repetition is $\binom{n \;+ \;r \;- \;1}{r}$, where $r$ may exceed $n$.
Integer solutions
The number of nonnegative integer solutions of the equation $x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_n = r$, $x_i \geq 0$, $1 \leq i \leq n$ is a case of combination with repetition, equivalent to distributing $r$ identical objects among $n$ distinct containers. Thus the answer is $\binom{n \;+\; r \;-\; 1}{r}$. The number of positive integer solutions is $\binom{r \;-\; 1}{n \;-\; 1}$.
Integer compositions
Ways in which to write a number as a sum of positive integers, where the order of the summands is considered relevant. There are $\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\binom{n \;-\; 1}{k} = 2^{n-1}$ integer compositions for each positive integer $n$.
Binomial theorem
If $x$ and $y$ are variables and $n$ is a positive integer, then $(x+y)^n = \binom{n}{0}x^0y^n + \binom{n}{1}x^1y^{n-1} + \binom{n}{2}x^2y^{n-2} + \cdots + \binom{n}{n-1}x^{n-1}y^1 + \binom{n}{n}x^ny^0 = \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}x^ky^{n-k}.$
Inclusion–exclusion principle
A counting technique which generalizes the method of obtaining the number of elements in the union of two finite sets; $|A \cup B| = |A| + |B| - |A \cap B|$. The general formula goes as follows... $$\left|\bigcup _{i=1}^{n}A_{i}\right| = \sum _{i=1}^{n}|A_{i}| \\ - \sum _{1\leqslant i<j\leqslant n}|A_{i}\cap A_{j}| \\ + \sum _{1\leqslant i<j<k\leqslant n}|A_{i}\cap A_{j}\cap A_{k}| \\ - \cdots \\ + (-1)^{n-1}\left|A_{1}\cap \cdots \cap A_{n}\right|.$$ Since the formula is a bit complicated, it is useful to begin with looking at examples with three or four sets in the book or online.

Relations and Functions

Sections 5.1–5.3, 5.6, 7.1–7.4 in Grimaldi.

Terminology and Notation

Cartesian product or cross product
For sets $A$ and $B$, the cartesian product $A \times B$ is the set of all ordered pairs $(a, b)$ where $a \in A$ and $b \in B$.
Relation
Any subset of $A \times B$ is called a relation from $A$ to $B$. Any subset of $A \times A$ is called a relation on $A$. We use $\mathcal{R}$ to denote a relation, and if $(a, b) \in \mathcal{R}$ we can use the infix notation $a~\mathcal{R}~b$ (and if $(a, b) \not\in \mathcal{R}$, $a~\mathord{\not\mathrel{\mathcal{R}}}~b$).
Function
A function $f$ from set $A$ to set $B$, denoted $f\!: A \to B$, is a special kind of relation from $A$ to $B$, in which every element of A appears exactly once as the first component of an ordered pair in the relation. If $(a, b)$ is an ordered pair in the relation, we write $f(a) = b$. Also, $f(A) = \{b\in B|b = f(a)$, for some $a \text{ in } A \}$.
Image and preimage
For $(a, b) \in f$, $b$ is called the image of $a$ under $f$ and $a$ is a preimage of $b$. Similarly, if $f\!: A \to B$ and $A_1 \subseteq A$, $f(A_1)$ is called the image of $A_1$ under $f$.
Domain
The set the function is defined upon to have as input. For the function $f\!: A \to B$, $A$ is called the domain. Every $a$ in $A$ maps to some $b$ in $B$.
Codomain
The set which contains all possible outputs of a function. For the function $f\!: A \to B$, $B$ is called the codomain. For each $b$ in $B$, there may or may not be an $a$ in $A$ such that $f(a) = b$. In other words, not all functions have mappings to all of the elements in the codomain. See injective and surjective below for the definitions of different types of functions in this regard.
Range
For $f\!: A \to B$, $f(A)$ is the range of the function. This is the subset of the codomain $B$ consisting of the elements $b$ for which there exist an $a$ in $A$ such that $f(a) = b$.
Restriction
Restrictin the domain of a function to a subset of the original domain. If $f\!: A \to B$ and $A_1 \subseteq A$, then the restriction of $f$ to $A_1$ is denoted $f|_{A_1}\!: A_1 \to B$, and it is valid as long as $f|_{A_1}(a) = f(a)$ for all $a$ in $A_1$.
Extension
Expanding a function beyond its original domain. Let $A_1 \subseteq A$ and $f\!: A_1 \to B$. If $g\!: A \to B$ and $g(a) = f(a)$ for all $a$ in $A$, then we call $g$ an extension of $f$ to $A$.
Injective or one-to-one
A function $f\!: A \to B$ is injective if each element of $B$ appears at most once as the image of an element of $A$. Therefore, given an injective function, no two elements $x_1, x_2$ in $A$ can map to the same element $y$ in $B$. If they do, then $x_1 = x_2$.
Surjective or onto
A function $f\!: A \to B$ is surjective if each element of $B$ appears at least once as the image of an element of $A$. Therefore, given a surjective function, for every $b$ in $B$ there exists at least one $a$ in $A$ such that $f(a) = b$. For a surjective function, the range and the codomain of the function are the same, $f(A) = B$.
Bijective or one-to-one correspondence
A function is bijective if it is both injective and surjective. Therefore, a function $f\!: A \to B$ is bijective if each element of $B$ appears only once as the image of an element of $A$.
Number of onto functions
May or may not be exam relevant. For finite sets $A$, $B$ with $|A| = m$ and $|B| = n$ there are $\sum^n_{k=0}(-1)^k\binom{n}{n \;-\; k}(n - k)^m$ onto functions from $A$ to $B$.
Equality of functions
Two functions are equal if and only if their domains and codomains are equal, and $f(x) = g(x)$ for all $x$ in their domain. As a counterexample, if $f\!: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$, $g\!: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Q}$, where $f(x) = g(x)$ for all $x$ in $\mathbb{Z}$, then $f$ and $g$ are not equal ($f \neq g$), since their domains are not equal, even though they have equal outputs for every possible input.
Identity function
The identity function for a set $A$, $1_A\!: A \to A$, is defined by $1_A(a) = a$ for all $a$ in $A$.
Composition of functions
The composite function of $f\!: A \to B_1$ and $g\!: B \to C$ is denoted $g \circ f\!: A \to C$ and is defined by $(g \circ f)(a) = g(f(a))$, for each $a$ in $A$, as long as $B_1 \subseteq B$. You can think of it as the first function $g$ "eating" the output of the second function $f$. If the range of $f$ is not a subset of the domain of $g$, then the composite function $g \circ f$ is not defined.
Powers of functions
If $f\!: A \to A$ we define $f^1 =f$, and for a positive integer $n$, $f^{n+1} = f \circ (f^n)$.
Converse of a relation
If $\mathcal{R}$ is a relation from $A$ to $B$, then the converse of $\mathcal{R}$, denoted $\mathcal{R}^c$, is the relation from $B$ to $A$ defined by $\mathcal{R}^c = \{(b, a)|(a, b) \in \mathcal{R} \}$. Simply put, it is the relation $\mathcal{R}$ just in reverse. The converse of a function is a relation which may or may not be a function.
Inverse of a function
For a function to have an inverse, it must be invertible. A function $f\!: A \to B$ is invertible if there exists a function $g\!: B \to A$ such that $g\circ f = 1_A$ and $f \circ g = 1_B$. You could also say that a function is invertible if it has a converse which is also a function. More specifically, a function is invertible if and only if it is injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto), i.e. it is bijective (one-to-one correspondence). The notation for the inverse of $f$ is $f^{-1}$, and since $f$ is invertible, $f^{-1} = f^c$.

More on Relations

Reflexivity
A relation $\mathcal{R}$ on a set $A$ is called reflexive if for all $x$ in $A$, $(x, x)$ is in $\mathcal{R}$. So if $x$ is related to anything else ($x$ occurs as a member of an ordered pair in the relation), it also means that $x$ is related to itself.
Symmetry
A relation $\mathcal{R}$ on a set $A$ is called symmetric if $(x, y) \in \mathcal{R} \Rightarrow (y, x) \in \mathcal{R}$, for all $(x, y)$ in $A$. So if $x$ is related to $y$, it means that $y$ is related to $x$.
Transitivity
For a set $A$, a relation $\mathcal{R}$ on $A$ is called transitive if, for all $x, y, z \in A$, $(x, y), (y, z) \in \mathcal{R} \Rightarrow (x, z) \in \mathcal{R}$. So if $x$ is related to $y$ and $y$ is related to $z$, then $x$ is also related to $z$,.
Antisymmetry
Given a relation $\mathcal{R}$ on a set $A$, $\mathcal{R}$ is called antisymmetric if for all $a, b \in A$, $(a~\mathcal{R}~b \text{ and } b~\mathcal{R}~a) \Rightarrow a = b$. So the only way that we can have both "$a$ is related to $b$" and "$b$ is related to $a$" is if $a$ and $b$ are the same.
Partial ordering relation or partial order
A relation is called a partial ordering relation if it is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive.
Equivalence relation
A relation is called an equivalence relation if it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
Composition of relations
If $A$, $B$ and $C$ are sets with $\mathcal{R}_1 \subseteq A \times B$ and $\mathcal{R}_2 \subseteq B \times C$, then the composite relation $\mathcal{R}_1 \circ \mathcal{R}_2$ is a relation from $A$ to $C$ defined by $\mathcal{R}_1 \circ \mathcal{R}_2 = \{(a, c)|a \in A, c \in C$ and there exists $b\in B$ with $(a, b) \in \mathcal{R}_1, (b, c)\in \mathcal{R}_2 \}$. Be careful in the composition in relations, since the order the composition is written in is different from the order function compositions are written in!
Partially ordered set or poset
If a relation $\mathcal{R}$ on a set $A$ is a partial ordering relation, we call the pair $(A, \mathcal{R})$ a partially ordered set or poset. If we call $A$ a poset, this is shorthand for saying that there is a partial order $\mathcal{R}$ on $A$ that makes $A$ into this poset.
Hasse diagram
A graphical representation of a partially ordered set, as a directed graph with an implied upward orientation. We construct a Hasse diagram for a poset by drawing an edge from $x$ up to $y$ if $x \mathcal{R} y$ and, most important, if there is no other element $z$ such that $x~\mathcal{R}~z$ and $z \mathcal{R} y$, i.e. it is the most "direct" way of relating. See the figure below.
Totally ordered poset
Also called linearly ordered. Let $(A, R)$ be a poset,